burdens would not have increased when new dietary items lixe pandanus and
breadfruit became available

for daily consumption.

Furthermore, while the population may have been near equilibrium with
‘their April dietary uptake,

individuals within the population may not have been.

This was apparent in the adult male 13766 body burden data where two individuals
show no decline in activity between the April 1978 and January 1979 whole body
count.

In ome case,

the individual was present on Bikini for only 5 months

prior to the April 1978 count.

This places the individual at approximately 60%

of his equilibrium body burden value.

In the second case, there seems to be no

clear explanation for the lack of any reduction in the body burden, however

1.

the individual may have lived away from Bikini prior to the April

count; hence, equilibrium was not established at the time of counting, or
2.

the individual changed his diet pattern between April and September.

These deviations from the norm do not alter the conclusion that equilibrium or near equilibrium may have been reached for the population as a whole for
1376,,

Indeed, they illustrate variations about a mean value.

Data collected between January 1979 and August 1980 also indicate that certain individuals have been ingesting 1376, at a rate which exceeds that of the
sample population.

This could in large part be due to visits to 3ikini or other

contaminated atolls between measurement dates.

The individual dosimetric data presented here clearly illustrates that at
least 19% of the Bikini residents would have received a dose equivalent in excess of 5 mSv (0.5 rem) due to the ingestion of 1376. had the April 1978 activ-

ity ingestion rate of 1376. continued.

This dose equivalent level dees not in-

clude the dose equivalent from external radiation or other internally deposited
radioactive material.

Removal of the Bikini population from Bixini Atoll

18

Select target paragraph3