Saas Np Fe
a.
SET
TTTye
I yena es eerie OTS
eis isse
7
platet
err
ree Le See pakoo otAIe ih ayete nuke Pa
a as
Aas
a
ion
. Re pera oeSeae oeakeres
ited:ars en eee Sarena
ty Sscor ahd
et bar: a
ato Ceent

a

r

o

i

'

r

.

~4

“OTOP eSs

CAPITOL

OY

SAIPAN

CHLL

M

.

“ote

~

C3 | RS

.

WICcCronesia

MARIANA ISLANDS

96950

Prone 9726/9743
Telex 724
rosie Nakuyana

July 30, L976

5267

.

MAILANAS DISTRICT
Olempio To. torja
Seto ww. Tenario

Dr. Robert A. Conard
Medical Devartment
Brookhaven Wational Laboratory

POSH A IL DISTRICT
rel

vio

iiokhya

coe Bl

Peal

el oma

Upton, New York

CDS TRAST

hsgarus ©. Salil

Dear Dr.

Soiyein Trnetuch!

letter dated July 9, 1976, from the people of Utirik

Arias lensi
Raney Ortar

to Mr.

TeUx DISTRICT
Nick Bossy

to you following the March survey.
To cate he hes
not received a response.
Furthermore, Congressmen

YAP DISTRICT
Jonn 4. Mangetel

Balos' letter dated May 5, 1976 to you hes not been

Poiwus Tun

answered.

MOUSE OF PEPRESENTATIVES

Consequently, we should like to pose some

questions, and seek some clarifications with resard
to the Rongelap-Utirik issue.

We would, therefore, appreciate learning of your
-esponses to the Representatives who made the inauiries,

‘gory

SARLAN AS DISTRICT

and also what response to the Utirik letter nas been

tdarcnan Cuerrera
saae

Roger Ray of ERDA at the Nevada Operations

Office. We would also like to make reference to an
earlier letter from Representative John Haglelgam

Toniwo Makayarna

Picmenda

BEST COPYAVAILABLE

Conard:

The purpose of this letter is to refer you to a

PCOMAPE DISTRICT

Roaotiawel

11973

sent by either you or by Mr. Roger Rey.

Pf abacias

bias

wd ae

Te

furthermore, we have heard that people of Rongelav
and Utirik have complained that it was our Committee

ELS DISTRICT
alos

which said, that no "descendants" of exnosed persons

warrior

would receive I.D.

boats

amended by P.L. Ifo.

sar

!

O

-

.

5-52,

as

Those who vould receive cards, would be those listed
on the BRL roster.
Furthermore, we recall that your
position was that there was no reason to include
descendants of exposed persons on the Bil roster for

NR ara
rtent

Public haw No.

5-60, indicates that descendants

are covered uncer the law.
However, tne benefits are
accorded to the »neovple under the 'YPL-=niDA agreement.

a

Dorey
ie

cards.

1
ali
fr

two reasons
1)
ait was unlikely that any effects
would be transmitted to subsequent generations, and
«

'

.

2)

ey

ty
1

7

,
*}

4

'

putting them on the roster and thus giving then

t.D. carés would lead them to belicve that they
fell into tne same dossage class as the
Rongelapese.

Ix

SPs
wey

'

tye

r

pes

ieddiaaal ttee,

Seay

ay

ranks x

Rows _

EAEKee
a 4

:

citcteed etereee rors MeeeMae ee ae Reoae
sith.

PONESENUi
operant
sCa
Aetamer
bearatanct
pr enenicbanhsincera Ne
Ee hire

e ee

Select target paragraph3