PRIVACY ACT MATERIAL REMOVED
|
AS, Site
~
—
Tabie [3
Comparison of Anthropumetric Data: i959 on Children With Retarded
Osseous Development With Those of Their Next Younger Sibs
Age in
Welght,
Stature,
Sitting
Head
Biacromiat
Br-iliac
Cait
YOU ver
Ib
em
he:ght.cm
:
circumlerence,om
owidth.cm
width.cm
circumference. cm
bas cleys
3H
S34.
EN2a
apg?)
S401.
$83 (2)
21.6611
Ir leet;
LF O02
20.8 ty
a]
oer
2
brrecd,
the kt
sha]
DUB b 23
meted
my 32
ay del
ares
feb)
22.852
2b.beds
iB
luo gihi
22412)
2) teh
5
4
rman lt.
Ped
SO 582
36.3 1
hae 2.7,
fh ta
a7 bila
J a6.
143 1)
WO 2)
225s
22d e.
In Grd)
ve td. 2h
22 Ah
232)
Ho
sty
moos,
bra |;
343012
SO Bl
GB +02
Oreds
536.
jJtot
rice,
a4id
2Da0]
22d. 25
17 342)
156011
20.1 (5
POL E-3
syodc.
Bed?
J3u 72
r7 O06?)
P22)
NO. .
Foy
85
"
4
bare
tous
cl
Jy
ord,
HL.
2
35.56,
4383 1;
bun ga
98.64
539]
"Numbers in parentheses cefer to ranking of cach tem.
toads
BS by
22
21.661;
Ib.5 41)
27.0.2)
P13 (1)
Ps incheanag the vounyer child or the smaller meusurement
am
TAT OT ty
ofthe I pag anef se 2) the oider chiud or the iarger
value.
5
meat.
Subject
sure to radiacdon. One boy i 26) showed less retardatton. One bov and one girl, also about the
Sanne age, were exposed to radiation but did not
show any retardation in bone development.
The hemhtand weight of the one exposed girl
with retarded osseous maturation were consider-
thls below chose of chronological age peers (Pable
Plo. Plowever. measurements on the one ex posed
virtosith normal bone development (233) were
notanferiore ta those of control chronological age
peers. She was slightly smaller than her control
skeletal age peers. For the bovs, unfortunately,
there were insufficient control chronological age
peers tor Caleulation of means. Comparison with
skelatal age peers indicated that two of the boys
with skeletal retardation were taller and one
shorter than the controls (able £1).
Corniparison of the physical sizes of the children
wit retarded skeletal maturation with the physicaulsizes of ther sibs brought out another signifi-
cant tinetng, Phree (subjects 24.3, and 65) of the
five Children with skeletal ave retardation were
shorter iistature in P9O0 than ther next younger *
Sths ad Pabte [2s see also Pieure §)). Tnerement data
mreic ated! that these three children fatled to show
satisfactory statural gain during the past two
years, even though iu L9S5G, atthe age of 25!
venus, all hree fad been taller than their younger
Figure 11. Brothers. Left, <5, age 6:
stbs. Phe ditference in age between sib pars
right, 295, age + (1960),
['855 11