es

wate

-?2.

Ls Se ee eef yestEEE te

ie piste

|p
* Anothex question we would like to raise is that
of eligibility. We are aware that some unexposed

‘

Rongelapese and Utirikese have developed thyroid

abnormalities, or have had operations.

How would you be

pig ee

prepared to testify on this question?
Does current
evidence and information allow you to differentiate

a eet
eth ce Wi cateae ott Seer

between those abnormalities which ore directly caused by
exposure and those which possibly are "normal" develop-

ments?
Can you support the assumption that some cases
were not caused by exposure by indicating that they cowd
not have resulted from exposure to low levels of residual
radiation in the environment and food chain?.

et aa

'

|

|
/

(3)
* Other questions which may be raised are: What
about compensation for those two cases who experienced
retarded growth, and should compensation be considered
for those women who experienced what appeared to be an
unusually high rate of miscarriages two to three years

wre BR

after exposure?

(y)

a
af

Be
a

the absence of sufficient medical data, that the probability in terms of statistics is very great that there
‘was a direct connection?

ely

oy

3.

Ane

Hp
‘

£8

%

i4

(ST)
# Related to the above, what are your best estimates
of the likelihood of encountering additional thyroid or
_leukemia cases in the future, ag well as ony new develop-

on
5. Suisnes
ees
eee

-

# We are certain that you will be asked to comnent

_ upon the connection between
death from
' leukemia, and his exposure.
Po you feel that there is
sufficient evidence to support this connection, or in

*

ments which are directly exposure-related?

“a

(G]

ie
td

* It has been recently indicated that survey results

of Bikini have resulted in a reevaluation and reconsideration of safe exposure levels there, and that the Bikinians

-"

=

eras

may not be able to return as planned.
recent development,

acientifically the criteria which led

return the Rongelapese to their island?

,

_

In light of this

is there any need to reevaluate

to the decision to

These are just some of the questions which come to mind
at this time.
We present them for your consideration
with a view to cooperating and coordinating any presenta-~
tion before the U.S. Congress snd between tne Congress

of Micronesia, the Department of the Interior, and

' Brookhaven.
In sum, we believe that 1% would be most
effective if ol] parties involved were in agreement on
certain basic issues when submitting testimony before
U.S. Congress.

te EE Cae : VENAOn
repreAGLI
TS
=“,

ALBEMha NY i

ree

,

\

Select target paragraph3