102
Antri P, U. VUORINEN and JonMa K. MIBTtTINEN, Caesiurm 137
a
\.1T.
Table 2
1Cs in Grass Samples Corresponding to the Milk Samples of Table 1.
Sample
pyc *7Cs/
l milk
No
48
23
18
12
1]
13
28
10
260
Farm
Apukka
10.6
300
3.
5.
Malminkartano
Jokioinen
9.1
11.4
250
330
8.
Myttéala
8.6
ywue®Cs/
ek
87
16.2
2.6
2.3
0.37
0.25
0.78
1.05
8.2
5.8
0.19
0.57
0.086
0.26
0.26
30
0.21
290
210
190
9.
12.0
3500
1100
*) DF =
0.91
12
7.0
6.6
790
690
780
li.7
0.69
I]
98
86
310
100
Ratio Cs/Sr**)
in grass in milk
2.5
220
8.3
12.0
13.3
Toivonniemi
ppc 87Cs/
gedry
DF*)
grass
940
6. Anttila
7. Kreuksela I
7b. Kreuksela IT
0.20
2.3
2.48
6.4
3.77
1.52
1.54
5.1
7.7
3.2
4.90
19.0
3.2
jyuc ™Cs/gK in milk
pe *"'Cs/gK in grass
**) upc 8'Ca/gK
Hye ™Srjg Ca
> amount
intensity
L102
ich is far
: relative
due to
r
L
L
¢-pulses,
stinguish
curve? corrected for background
ata 2
“
+~K
—*— 3 final Cs peak
~
L
&.
thod.,
nination
3 that of
Cs
fete
1.
2. Viik
2" Seinen
mination
tive zirr + ®Nb
Grass ash
g
Samples
itamina1€ Cause |
1) as in
Lapland
3 of the
1othern-
erage of
1g ratio
; 18 also
Qs
10
1”
Ener
Me
Fig. 1. Differential pulse height spectrum of grass sample No 9.
a