132 Conclusions. 1. The wes in the Group 20 to 2) years, especially, reflect excellent physical development. ‘he 4 value for biceps girth is 10.65 compared vith 10.32 for « reference military (young) ann* (A difference greater then 0.20 is highly significant}. 2. By comtrast, the vonen (ages 24 to 39) vith the exception of the arm wensuremeats are either physically inmeture, cor they have lost « cousiderebie ancunt of lean tissne, The striking imesturity is reflected in the girths cf hipe and thigh. The d values for these measurements are gach lower than the comparable d values for « reference wmas an! for the meen values for a group of Americas vonen usagured about 1937 - 1939 vy the Dept. of agriculture im comection with garwent patterns. is noteworthy. ‘The relatively eamll sire of the calf moeculature ‘The 4d values for arm sise compare favorably with thoee of be cts 1, weference woman and with those of the USDA (35-39 yr) group.