TABLES

1,1 Energy Partition in Fission -----------+----+-------+----------+.--2- 10

1.2
2,1
2.2
2.3

Calculated Buildup Factors~--------------------------------. ee
Exposure Ranges of the Emulsions- --~---------------------~------Quartz-Fiber Dosimeter Ranges -- --------------------+-+------.-.
Station Layout and Utilization -------------------------------+---.

12
15
15
20

2.4 Station Construction -------------------------+---+-- +--+ ee 21
2.5 Film Sensitivity to Neutrons - ----------------------------------- 23
2.6 Initial-Gamma-Expcsure Correction Factors------------------------- 23

2.7 Residual-Gamma-Exposure Correction Factors ----------------------- 24
3.1 Shot Cherokee Data--~---------------------------------------+- 30
3.2 Shot Zuni Total Exposure - ---------------------------+--------- 30
3.3 Shot Zuni Initial-Gamma Exposure- - ------------------------------ 31
3.4 Shot Flathead Fox-Complex Instrumentation and Recovery ---------------- 31

3.5 Shot Flathead Initial Exposure- ---------------+-----------+--+----+--3.6 Shot Flathead Quartz-Fiber Exposure versus Time Device-------~-------3.7 Shot Flathead Residual Exposure -- ------+------------------------3.8 Shot Dakota Instrumentation and Recovery-----------------+---------3.9 Shot Dakota Initial Exposure - ----------------------------------3.10 Shot Navajo Instrumentation and Recovery - ----------------~-------3.11 Shot Navajo Initial-Gamma Exposure ----------------------------3.12 Shot Navajo Residual Exposure ------------------------------+--

32
34
34
34
35
36
37
37

3.14
3.15
3.16
3.17

39
39
41
41

3.13 Shot Tewa Instrumentation and Recovery --------------------------- 38
Shot Tewa Residual Exposure ---------------+----+------+-+----+---+
Shot Tewa Initial-Gamma Exposure ------------+--+---+-+-+--++------Redwing Initial-Gamma Exposure- ------------------------------Yields and Relative Air Densities-----------------------.--------

FIGURES

1.1 Gamma exposurefor | kt surface burst- - --------------------------- 11

2.1 Co® calibration curves for film types- - ---------------------------- 16

2.2 Co? calibration curves for film types- - ---------------------------- 16
2.3 Co®® calibration curves for film types- ----------------------------- 17
2.4 Quartz fiber rate device with dosimeters ---------~----------------- 19

2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9

Quartz fiber rate device with dropping mechanism ---~----------------200 curie Co™® calibration curve ------~--------------------- eee
Dupont 502 energy dependence curve normalized to Co™ value ------------Dupont 510 energy dependence curve normalized to Co® value ----~-------Dupont 606 energy dependence curve normalized to Co™ value -------------

19
22
25
25
26

2.10 Quartz fiber dosimeter energy dependence curve normalized

to Covalue------+----------+----------------- +--+ 26

2.11 AN/PDR-39 energy dependence curve normalized to Co® value------------ 27

3.1 Initial-gamma exposure versus time for quartz fiber rate device --~-------- 33
3.2 Initial-gamma exposure versus distance for Shots Cherokee
and Zuni - ------------ <2 eee eee eee ee ee ee ee re eee 40
3.3 Initial-gamma exposure versus distance for Shots Flathead,
Dakota, and Navajo-------------+-------- 22 - eee er tee ere 42

3.4 Initial-gamma exposure versus distance for Shots Navajo and Tewa---------- 42

3.5 Shot Zuni 76-hour residual exposure (roentgens) - --------------------- 43

3.6 Shot Flathead 72-hour residual exposure (roentgens) ------------------- 43

3.7 Shot Navajo 48-hour residual exposure (roentgens) - - -~-~----------------- 44

3.8 Shot Tewa 78-hour residual exposure (roentgens)

3.9

---~------------------ 44

Comparison of data from Redwing and previous operations,

DRYWversus R -~---------------- ee e e e e
8

eee

e ee ee 45

Select target paragraph3