where the reductions in the estimated ingestion doses in this paper are shown asa function of the environmental half-life. For example, if the environmental half-life of 137Cs is equal to its radiological half-life of 30 y, then the estimated ingestion.doses would be 50% of what wepresentin this paper. The problem, of course, is in determining Aenvironmental) people), or both. To charactefize such uncertainty and variability in estima each input variate (Bogen and S Nazaroff et al., 1987; IAEA, 1989; We are in the process of evaluating data from Enewetak and Bikini Atolls that we have accumulated since 1978. We also have data from samples collected at Rongelap Atoll from 1986 to 1993 from specific trees first sampled in 1959 and 1961. These data will provide at least a limited retrospective look at the environmental half-life over this 30-y period. Although we have not completed our analysis of these data and cannotat this time incorporate an actual environmental half-life in our dose assessment, the net result must be to reduce the total dose received from internal and external exposures. as a function of ingested 137Cs (L ICRP, 1990, 1991a) was replacef@ following single-compartment model: qi{t;) = FBR); eA Uncertainty and Interindividual Variability in Estimated Rongelap Doses atany time t, 0 st; St, qi (u) = 4BK + A) ilu) for any time u, fj; Su St, The doses presented above were calculated using arithmetic mean values for each of the parameters in the dose models, such as body weight, residence time of radionuclides in the body, radionuclide concentrations in food and soil, dietary intake (in g d-!), and fractional deposition of radionuclides in body compartments. The distributions for some of these parameters are shown in the following figures; both log and linear probabilityplots are given on each graph. Figures 6 and 7 show the distribution of body weights for Marshallese females and males, respectively; Figures 8 and 9 thedietary intakes; Figures 10, 11, 12, and 13 the Pu and Am concentrations in soil; and, Figures 14 and 15 the 137Cs concentrations in drinking coconut meat and fluid. Most of these data are lognormally distributed. | Estimated dose is a function of distributed quantities reflecting either uncertainty (i.e., lack of knowledge concerning “the true” value) or interindividual variability (which hereafter will be referred to simply as “variability,” i.e., heterogeneity in values pertaining to different gij(u) = FBRy e44i e(BK +A )u for any time u, tj; <u St, by the (1) (2) (3) in which: q;;(u) is the activity, in Bqfkg-! body weight, of 187Cs ij n the whole body at Any time u following ingestion of an activity Rj Jin Bq kg"! body weight) of 137Cs contained in a f type j at time t,, prime © denotes dif with respect i rate of 137Cs, K = Ln(2)H-! is the bio rate of 137Cs from the dominagt “slow dose-estimation uncertainty factor) [associated ' with Rij and B is a factor re uncertainty associated with H. angle brackets ({ }) denote ma expectation only with respect to un an overbar denotes expectation only to interindividual variability. Daily intakes Rj in Bq kg! d-! bf 137Cs in local food items of type j were ass 37