fruit,

roots,

litter,

and stems of

All samples were handled separately,

edible (Pandanus, breadfruit, coconut,

placed

papaya, banana, and squash) and non-

LLL for processing and analysis.

edible indicator (Seaevola and

soll and vegetation samples were

Messervsenmmidia) plants were collected

analyzed both by Ge(Li) gamma spec~

when available.

trosocopy and by wet chemistry for

We attempted to take

in plastic bags,

and sent to

at least one soil profile, and pre-

the following radionuclides

ferably as many as

1.2):

three,

through the

root zone of each sampled plant.

re

Pe,

02m A LOm,

In

addition to the soil profiles taken

area

through the root zone of sampled

28,

vegetation, other soil profiles were

00 ny |

Sen 155), .

(see Ref.

20 ee

Meo.

Ail

106

133e 4, Tog.

207s

228.

2385 239 ou 2400 24ly

and OO a,

collected on a random basis on both

Bikini and Eneu Islands.

The geoDATA ANALYSIS

graphical locations of these profiles
are also shown in Fig.

3.

The surface-soil

ALl profile samples were taken
from pits dug with a backhoe.
the pit was dug,

After

normal distributions and thus, we

calculated
geometric means of
t
90.
Sr,

carefully cut back a few centimeters

profile.

undisturbed

For each profile,

to 15 cm)

activities appear to approximate log-

the sidewalls were

to ensure a clean,

(0

L5?7

Cs,

239,240,
Pu,

concentrations

LOO-em*

Island

as

in

soil

a whole

and

and
for

for

6065,

d

sn

Eneu
the

four

samples were collected from the side~-

areas of

wall at increments of

For each profile collected, we plotted

5 em in the

interest on Bikini

Island.

upper part and of 10 to 20 em through -

(on semilog paper)

the lower part of the profile.

of the selected nuclides as a function

Total

the concentrations

depth for profile samples varied from

of depth.

25 to 105 cm.

pared in an attempt

(see Appendices A and B).

carefully selected and classified by
For example,

collected leaves

Because they are the major contri-

butors to the dose from ingestion of

were classified as young, mature,
and senescent.

Two ages of litter

terrestrial foods

90,

were readily identifiable and were
collected accordingly.

3

We

stages of growth were unavailable.

For

gree
“soeica

-5-

inad

137, s,

selected

However,

fruit samples representing different

sheets
eoemers

to characterize

the different areas of the islands

Vegetation and litter samples were

age.

The profile data were com-

and

(Refs.

1,

2 4G
é
239,
240
Pu

7, 8),
were

for more detailed analysis.

calculated

concentration factors

these nuclides from measured

Select target paragraph3