Leo M.

Krulitz

October 30, 1979
Page Seven

As I have said,

the two principal considerations which

are relevant to a decision about Enjebi, are the likely

health effects from radiation exposure, if the island
is to be resettled, and the likely adverse impact of denying
resettlement.
The dose estimates were done and set forth in the AEC Task

Group Report and in §5.6.1 of the EIS.

The risk estimate,

that is the estimated number of health effects associated
with each resettlement alternative, was calculated and
set forth in Table 5-12, Vol. I of the EIS.
The same

subject is treated in the text at §5.6.2.

A comparison

of the health effects for all five cases is contained
in Table 5-13 at p. 5-51.

The health effects predicted in 1975 for the resettlement
of Enjebi are not substantially different from those which
have been calculated on the basis of the most recent data.
The dose estimates which we find in the EIS, at §5.6.1
(which are in turn drawn from the AEC Task Group Report

and the Enewetak Radiological Survey), are somewhat higher

than current predictions, I suspect, because of the
unrealistic dietary model which-was used.
See Enewetak
Radiological Survey, NVO-140, Vol. I, pp. 492-498.
(Dr.

W.L. Robison observed that "it would .. . appear that
dose calculations based upon [the NVO-140 dietary model] may
overestimate the total dose via the food chains.

..

Id. p. 497.)
In any case, we were faced then with health
effects on the order of less than a single case of cancer
Or a single genetic defect as a result of resettlement of
Enjebi, a prospect essentially the same as we now have

before us.

I have not discussed the concern with exposure from the
transuranics via the inhalation pathway.
That situation
has been improved, insofar as more rigorous permissible
limitations have been imposed than those included in
the impact statement.

I am not sure of this,

however,

but it seems to me that the soil removal may have reduced
the concentrations of fission products as well.
While it seems clear to me that the proposal to resettle
Enjebi was thoroughly studied in 1975 in the course of
the environmental impact statement, there is one serious flaw

Ly

Select target paragraph3