Leo M.

Krulitz

October= 30,

Page Two

1979

-

.

At our request, architect Carlton Hawpe (who speaks Marshallese
and English) was engaged by Holmes & Narver and Holmes &

Narver was engaged to assist in the drafting of the master
plan.

It went very well.

completed.

In November 1973,

the plan was

It included two major settlements:

one at

Enewetak island in ‘the south and the other at Enjebi.

Enjebi was included because that is what the people wanted
and because no one in the government even suggested that
Enjebi could not be included.

In September 1974, when General Warren D. Johnson, then

DNA director,

came to Enewetak atoll to meet with the people

and present the draft environmental impact statement, the

people were informed for the first time that the Atomic
Energy Commission recommended against the resettlement of
Enjebi and would oppose the funding of the entire program
if Enjebi were included.
General Johnson was accompanied
by high level representatives of the Atomic Energy Commission,
the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection
Agency and the Trust Territory Government.

It was clear to all of us, that is to the people of Enewetak

and their counsel, that we had no real choice.
It was a
matter of acceding to the AEC “recommendation” and revising
the Master Plan to cut Enjebi out, or having no cleanup

and resettlement program at all.

EIS, yol.

I §7.

The people of Enewetak returned to Ujelang to revise the
Master Plan, to move everyone to residences in the southern
islands of Enewetak, Medren and Japtan.
That was not an
easy accomodation to achieve,

even though they are a

remarkably cohensive and cooperative group, but it worked
out and the revised Master Plan of March 1975 excluded
Enjebi.

EIS, Vol. II,

Tab D.

I want to make it very clear that the people of Enewetak
never did agree to forego the resettlement of Enjebi.
They acceded to it at the time because they had no real

choice.
To be sure, the "Case 3", which excluded Enjebi,
was presented as a "recommendation."
See draft EIS §5.4.3.

But the AEC had made up its mind unilaterally, in advance,
and without the support of the AEC, the government's
radiation experts, prospects for funding of the program

were scant if not nonexistent.

Select target paragraph3