eh
200
one
ao
:
.
fot
8
»
.
2
:
«4
.
ae
.
St.
|
*
.
*
t,t
4
|
i
on
a
ee ee
‘
i1
'
|
i
1
.
150 Pp ep ee eee eee
1
i
:
:
wae
a
~~ re ee ey — -+
L
:
*
.
:
ee
.
y
Eva cua hicar
AT SHR
we
mee
eee
-o ode
an
i
.
i
|
:
t
:
:
t
=L
a
‘
‘
i
i
aq
}
z
}-
t
ts
i
!
2
o
a
'
100
pe
wee
<{
t
t
:o
|
|!
:
{
:
:
i
SO }—- 25 =
;
!
FALLOUT
4-5 HR
‘
|
10
20
reo}
Fig. 1.3
\
:
|
|
!
x”
qo
J
+
a
50
a60
Cumulative Dose as a Function of Time After the Detonation
PER CENT AIR DOSE AT SURFACE
*
Br ALD
Doni SS Lo Muy byfe &
arene 7 oeae ep
4
DATE
—,
STATUS VERIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
,
i
:
TIME (HR}
4
eee ae ee
:
t
°o
4m EXPOSURE,
MANY SOURCES
RATIOLS&
BILATERAL EXPOSURE,
i
7NX
!
10
i
i
fe.
.
VHF
1
|
a
i
i
:1
o
DIVERGING SQURCE
| 39%"
;
5
,
'
!
|
!
i
!
;
,
|
|
'
i
|
15
20
25
30
J
10
-------
:
|.
x~*
S
4
36
CM MASONITE
_
DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN CYLINDRICAL PHANTOM, COM FACILITY, (NMR I)
t
Fig. 1.4
|
i
i
;
[
i
Comparative Depth Doses for Biltteral Exposure from a Small Source and Atulliple
Source ts Exposure woth Cobalt -60
21
as
meeONG