petach'te nme ohanaiim &

TP

athee es

wi

et he de

delay of stimulation provides a means
of measuring the speed of nerve con-

duction. Helmhoitz used a_ reactiontime experiment to measure the speed
of nerve transmission and found it to
be between 50 and 60 meters per second. When localization is used to estimate the speed of conduction, the estimates are much greater. Von Békésy
estimates the speed of transmission for
vibrations on the skin to be 208 meters
per second. He suggests that there are
two speeds

of neural

conduction—a

fast process for the inhibitory interactions that produce localization, and
a slower process for the growth of a

sensation. Whereas localization is determined within a few milliseconds
after the onset of a stimulus, the time
necessary for the growth of a sensa-

tion may take from 20 milliseconds in
hearing to more than 1000 milliseconds

in

taste,

smell,

and

vibration.

Von

Békésy found that the speed of neural
transmission is greatly affected by temperature and pain. He reports that an
electric shock applied 10 seconds before an observation will cause a significant drop in the speed of nerve
transmission. The lower speeds reported

from animal studies may therefore be
due to the effects of anesthesia, temperature, and pain which disturb the

nervous system.
Localization is a powerful method
for. probing neural activity. Cyclic

changesin localization when the tongue

is stimulated indicate a periodicity in

taste sensations. Localization phenome-

na also divide the four basic taste

effects that produce a sharp localization.
Von Békésy’s contrast of the use
of psychological and electrophysiological methodsto investigate semsory func-

sistent with psychological experiments
before electrophysiological measures of
neural responses can be interpreted unambiguously.

nesses of each approach. The limitations besetting each method make it
important that sensory functions be
studied by both electrophysiological

Von Békésy discusses the difficulties
of using psychological observations in
the analysis of sensory functions. The
foremost requirement is that methods
of stimulation produce a well-defined
and constant effect. The book amply
attests to the difficulty of this requirement and to von Békésy’s skill in arranging experimental procedures that
meet it. Von Békésy shows that psychology can be as precise in its meth-

tions highlights the strengths and weak-

and

psychological

experiments.

Von

Békésy suggests, for example, that localization of a stimulus is determined by
the onset of nervefiring, the later firing
serving to indicate the magnitude and
quality of a sensation. The evidence
here is psychological. A 2000-cycleper-second tone can be determined
quite well from only two cycles of
vibration; similarly, localization of a
vibratory pattern on the skin of the

strates the difficulty in wsing only
electrophysiological methods to study
sensory processes. Electrophysiological-

on the particular sensation one is con-

ly, there is at present no means for

separating the initial burst from suc-

ceeding spikes in neural transmission

and for correlating initial bursts with
the phenomenal property of localization
and succeeding spikes with the properties of magnitude and quality. A central problem in the study of sensory
processes is the relationship between
neural responses and subjective attributes. Von Békésy’s discussion emphasizes that any hypothesis about
the neurophysiological correlates of sen-

bitter and sweet or sour and salt pro-

ing divergence between electrophysio-

two groups:

and sweet-bitter. Simultaneous stimulation of the sides of the tongue with
duces a single sensation in the middle

of the tongue which can be moved

from side to side by suitably timing
the stimulations. A single sensation is

not produced, however, for simultaneous stimulation with bitter and sour
or salt and sweet. Thus there appears

mentioned in the book, a most interest-

logical and psychological studies con~
cerns the question of coding taste. Electrophysiological measures indicate that

there are no receptors that are spe-

cifically

sensitive

to

taste

qualities;

rather, taste is determined by the pattern of neural activity. In contrast, von

to be a closer relation between bitter
and sweet and between salt and sour
than between other pairs. An unusual

Békésy’s psychological studies indicate
that there are single receptors which
are sensitive to specific tastes such as

vibrators with frequencies of 20, 40,
80, 160, and 320 cycles per second

sible that electrophysiological recordings from nerve fibers do not fully
reflect the funneling action that occurs

type of neural funneling is shown when

are placed on the arm. Only the mid-

die vibration of 80 cycles per second
is felt. The presence of all the vibrators, however, increases the magnitude

of the sensation through summation.

This indicates that even a flat maxi-

mum may set into action inhibitory
8 DECEMBER 1967

ever. The sensory effects produced by
even a simple and precisely defined

stimulus are often numerous, and the

plete cycles are presented. This demon-

sory attributes must remain tentative
in the absence of corroborating psychological experiments. Though not

into

ods as electrophysiology. Precise experimental control is not sufficient, how-

arm will occur when only two com-

sour-salt

sensations

Experimental Methods

salt, sour, bitter, and sweet. It is pos-

at higher levels of the nervous system,

or that the taste system in man differs from that of animals. Whatever

the final resolution of this issue, it reveals clearly that electrophysiological
recordings must be shown to be con-

subject must be trained to report only

cerned with and to inhibit other sensations. A careful analytic description

of the possible percepts may even be
necessary. Perceptual experiments for
the purposes of sensory analysis must

be guided by an introspective attitude
that reduces cognitive and motivational

factors to a minimum.
Funneling

and inhibition can

also

occur at a cortical level. A form of
cortical inhibition is involved in the

fact that we appear to observe discon-

tinuously, taking in sensory information
in temporal quanta. Through training
one can also learn to inhibit stimulation.

For example,

a

singer

appar-

ently can be trained not to hear the
bone-conducted sounds coming from
his throat and to hear his voice only
through the air-conducted sounds. A
complex case of funneling occurs in
the projection of sensations outside the

body. Von Békésy reports that when
there is a time interval in stimulating
the two knees with vibrators there is
a jumping of sensation from one side
to

the other depending upon which

knee is stimulated first. After several

weeks of training, however, a subject
can experience a continuous motion of

the vibratory sensation from one knee
to the other as a function of the time
interval. Now when the knees are stim-

ulated simultaneously, the vibrations

are localized in the free space between
them. Moreover, a displacement of the
sensation in this free space will occur

with suitable changes in the timing of
stimulation. The projection of sensations into external space appears to be
1297

Select target paragraph3