Chopter / INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVES The objectives of this project were to: (1) understand the oceanography of the fallout area, so as to allow better analysis of the fallout area; (2) determine by oceanographic methodsthe intensity and extent of fallout andconvert this to land-equivalent values; (3) study the circulation water within Bikini Lagoon and predict the movementof the radioactive material suspended in the lagoon; (4) install and maintain anchored instrument stations in deep ocean water; and (5) perform radiochemical analyses on as wide a scope as possible with equipment on hand. In achieving these objectives, it was hoped that enough information concerning the study and measurement of fallout at sea would be gained to permit a reduction in the number and types of measurements required to describe the fallout phenomena under various conditions of detonation. It was also anticipated that the early determination of the initial fallout distribution would be valuable to other agencies making long-range studies of the radioactive water mass. 1.2 BACKGROUND The existence of fission-product problems —control, disposal, and fallout— were recognized virtually simultaneously with the discovery of fission. Various plans to safeguard test personnel and adjacent citizenry have been a part of all test programs since Operation Trinity. For shots in the 20-kt range, fallout was scarcely more than an added overkill on targets already heavily damaged by thermal andblast effects. An early exception was Shot Baker, Operation Crossroads, in which a highly contaminating test against refractory targets gave evidence of the added offenSive value of fallout materials. The high-airburst geometry of many tests, including the Japanese attacks, precluded much attention to fallout. It had long been apparent, however, that fallout-radiation intensities increase with some fractional power of the total yield for weapons having the same percentage of fission yield. Any fallout model is complicated by the natural conditions of atmospheric circulation; and at the time of Shot Mike, Operation Ivy, exploration of mathematical and analogue models was more popular than extensive field studies, and only a cursory fallout study was included in the weapon-effect Program of that shot. Though extremely contaminating, Shot Mike was carried out without conSpicuous evidence of the fallout potentialities, with the negligible exception of the experience of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) reaearch vessel, the M/V Horizon (Reference 1). Operation Castle included a more thorough investigation, consisting of manned and shielded Vessels and free-floating telemetering collectors. Shot 1 illuminated the severity of the fallout Problem. Following a hastily-mounted survey for Shots 5 and 6 of Operation Castle (Reference Redwing, The specific historical background of the methodology is reported in the appropriate 2) and other experiences (Reference 3), the work, reported herein, was envisaged for Operation individual chapters, A Particularly valuable innovation in Operation Redwing was the organization of the Program Ontrol Center, from which all survey elements of the fallout program were directed and

Select target paragraph3