. ..-

,-,

-----

-----

----

.

. . .

.

. . .

.

.

-.

.

. .

-4-

INPUT DATA
Surface

meteorological

observations

the U.S.S. Curtiss

which cruised

fall

the debris

rapidly

surface,
upper

from

were available

from some atolls and from

south of Bikini; however,

cloud to the surface

since the larger

and spend

little

particles

time

near

the

are the
not many surface reports were used. Of far greater importance
.
air wind observations
taken at four sites near Bikini atoll. Other significant

input data consisted
(north=south),

cell sizes of 34 km (east-west)

and 1 km in the vertical,

stabilization
individual

of a flat topography,

time,

source

nuclides,

rates

and particle

for

stem
both

and cap debris
gross

size spectrum

fission

by 17 km

cloud geometries

products

and

due

to gross

at

selected

parameters.

CALCULATIONS
Gross Fission Products
The
products
shown

time-integrated
from detonation

in Fig. 1.

inte=~ated
For
Strauss[6]
Rongelap

for

only

distance

dose

pattern

to evacuation
next

(in rads)

time

of Rogelap

to Ailinginae,

values up to the time p“eople were evacuated
comparison,
are

given

the

and Ailinginae

Utirik

value

in Table

1.

are lower.

total

Note

dose,

that

the

calculations

The code calculations
This variation

variation

wind observations

of

However,

atolls.

estimates.

“tuning’!; also a possible
the

time

The numbers

at odds with earlier
those

external

were

from the atolls of concern)

appears

in wind directions
from

the

U.S.S.

Rongerik,

fission

atolI (5 I hours) are
and Utirik

atolls

are

from those atolls.
estimated

by

agreement

Dunning

is very

for Rongerik
for Rongerik

may be an explanation.

for

are higher, while
a problem

and speeds at late
south

good

and

and Utiri!< are

to be in part

Curtis,

[51

of

times when

of Bikini (some

.-. .

Select target paragraph3