- 46 that the nets were of nylon rather than silk and the mesh was slightly more
open in the "fine"net.

(For the "fine" net, mesh size was 157 per inch

as compared to 174 per inch when silk was used. )
The radioactivity of the plankton samples from the six collections since
March 1954 is summarized in Table 12.

It will be noted that the present

level of activity in Rongelap lagoon is less than 0.5 of a microcurie per
kilogram of wet sample, that the radioactivity of the plankton off Rongelap
Island continues to be less than that of the sample off Kabelle Island, and
that the radioactivity of the plankton in Ailinginae lagoon was somewhat
greater than the radioactivity of the plankton in Rongelap lagoon.

The signi-

ficantly greater activity of the Ailinginae plankton was unexpected.
This greater value may be within the error that is typical of plankton
samples; another explanation is the possibility that the exchange of ocean
water and lagoon water is slower at Ailinginae than at Rongelap.

The shape

of the atolls would suggest this althcugh the relative rates of exchange are
not known.

Rongelap is roughly circular in shape with wide, deep passes in

both the northeast and scuth while Ailinginae is rectangular in shape with its
largest pass, in the southern part of the atoll, shallower than the Rongelap

passes (Fig. 1).
east.

The wind-driven ocean currents are from the north-north-

Water samples from off Rongelap Island and from Ailinginae lagoon

do not indicate differences in activity, possibly because the counting techniques of the Laboratory are insensitive to very low counts.
The rate of decline of radioactivity of Rongelap lagoon plankton was de-

termined from the data in Table 12 by averaging all the values for any one

Select target paragraph3