The F value of 27.22 is significant at the 97.5% confidence level. The mean TRU concentration in the plowed blocks was 62.8 pCi/g before plowing and 8.2 pCi/g after plowing, an 87% reduction. A comparison of the original with the repeat IMP readings on the unplowed blocks shows that the treated blocks may legitimately be used as self-controls. The original TRU concentrations averaged 77.2 pCi/g, and the repeat values averaged 75.2 pCi/g. This is well within the measurement error of the IMP detector, and shows that the untreated concentrations did not change between the measurements. To test whether the pattern of contamination in the soil was altered by plowing, a multivariate analysis of variance was performed on the soil profile data. The null hypothesis was that the vector of mean concentrations by depth was not changed by plowing, and the alternative was that the vector of means was significantly altered. The maximum likelihood estimator was used, yielding a chi-square (seven degrees of freedom) statistic of 16.7. The null hypothesis can be rejected at the 97.5% confidence level; i.e., plowing did significantly alter the vector of mean concentrations. The last part of the statistical analysis was an attempt to describe the after-plowing distribution mathematically. If the plow mixed the soil, and hence the contamination, the concentrations would be fairly uniform with depth. To check this, a linear regression of mean 4lam concentration as a funetion of depth was performed for each of the four plowed blocks. The slopes of the lines were then tested for significant deviations from zero. The null hypothesis was that the slope was zero;i.e., there was no gradient with depth. The results are: Plot No. Equation of Line Test of Hg:B, = 0 vs, H;:B,40 1 Y = 3.6 - 0.06X Accept Hg at 90% 2 Y = 0.7 + 0.007K Accept Hg at 80% 3 ¥ = 0.89 + 0.03X Accept Hg at 80% 4 Y = 0.47 + 0.02X Accept Hg at 80% In all four cases, the slope apparently did take place. did not significantly differ from zero, so that some mixing However, in each block there were at least two subsurface observations of concentrations much higher than the bulk of the depth samples. This indicates that some of the surface contamination is deposited by the plow at depth without being mixed. Of the ten such "hot" Spots, two were near the surface (0 to 10 cm), two were at 10 to 15 em, and the remainder were 30 cm or deeper. The TRU concentrations in the 10 spots ranged from 25% to 100% of the original (before-plowing) TRU from IMP value, with a median of 35%. There was a weak trend of less contamination (as percent of original) being deposited with increasing depth for the "hot" spots. Other than these "hot" spots, observed TRU values rarely exceeded 6.6 pCi/g, regardless of the original surface concentration. Conclusions The plowing experiment has clearly demonstrated that surface contamination can be reduced substantially by plowing in Enewetak-type conditions. The multivariate analysis confirmed that the distribution of contamination across the entire profile is altered significantly. Contamination is mixed throughout the plowed profile; however, some proportion is deposited at depth with little mixing. In mixed areas, the contamination is highly diluted, regardless of the original concentration. "Hot" spots are inevitable and can be expected to result in concentrations of 25-50% of the original surface levels. These "hot" spots were observed to occuratall depths sampled, but most were observed at 30 cm or deeper. B-9-20