This panel it turns out was a committee of the PSAC and this accounts for the nvitation to the members to a second meeting of the panel on 27-28 February_to go ver the preliminary draft report of the Panofsky panel as well as their comments hich are to be submitted prior to this meeting. hite House, Spurgeon Keeny. The invitation came from the zL E | Contained in this folder is « ory of Sradbur-'s with the help of the Staff) brief comments on the situation racarsing space esting and detection. wwe: The objectives of a space testing system in priority order improvement of weapons and warheads; obtaining ‘scientific information about space and nuclear explosions in space and other weapons effects; and obtaining fn meen, -nformation addressed to a possible detection system of space weapons testing. fe briefly estimates the priority weapons developments which might require testing at this time and estimates the types of and quality of measurements which could be> nade on outer space tests. He concludes that, if space testing is legal as opposed 70 testing in other environments, we should come as close to the earth's surface as wssible avoiding the fall-out argugment which means that deep space tests would not ve desirable and that lower level xe the way to go. testing at altitudes as low as Tegk and Orange would . As for the question of a complete ban on testing where space testing would be illegal, he doesn't feel we would attempt then to use this regime but wow. Sites concentrate on the detection of space tests. One interesting opinion of Bradbury's expressed is “that "breakthroughs” in the atomic weapon business are both mlikely and unlikely to be achieved through space testing.” ith him to the 27-28 February meeting. He carried these comments