Table 1 Fraction of Initial l3lr Activity Ingested That s Excreted on Given Day Post-Intake Days PostIntake Reference Fema le® - l 5 1.4 x 1074 10 1-9 x 107% 25 9.2 x 10> 7 1-4 x 107% Reference Male# Reference Male? , 4A x 107! 1.8 x 1074 1.9 x 1074 8.0 x 107) 9.0 x 107) - 1.4 x 1074 1.4 x 107+ 1.4 x 1074 1.4 x 1074 Fraction of Stable Lodine Ingested That Is Excreted on a Given Day Post-Intake for a Normal Adult Male Days PostIntake 1 Re ference Male? - Reference Male? A Normal Male 4.6 x 1071 4 x 107! 4.6 x 107% 7 x 107% 5 2.3 x 1074 2.3 x 107+ 17 5.4 x 1077 5.4 x 10° + 10 5 4.3 x 107% 6.9 x 1074 7.5 x 1074 9 x 1074 7 x 10+ 7 x 1074 2tJo4hnson Model (Jo&81). ICRP 30 Model (ICRP79). “3erman (8e67), read from graph. do not all agree but are within a factor of 2 for any specific location at Rongelap and Utirik Atolls. A significant difference between the Armed Forces, Rand and Naval exposure-rate contours occurs 32 to 190 km (20 to 120 miles) north of Rongelap Atoll out to a distance of 480 km (300 miles) east of the detoNation site. See Figure 2 for the relative location of the atolls and people. Peterson estimated downwind exposures using a modified MATHEW-ADPIC computer code (Pe81). Additionally, Peterson developed instantaneous activity concentrations for 12946, 131,, 13 1, 37cs, and 155ku for Ailingnae Atoll and the southeastern part of Rongelap Atoll near Rongelap Island. The computer codes were developed for the Atmospheric Release Advisory Capability of the Department of Energy. They were modified to include a larger number of upper-air