409802
UNITED STATES
ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20545
March 31, 1975
Tommy McCraw, OS
Nat Barr, DBER
Bill Forster, DBER
Sid Marks, DBER
COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO MITCHELL'S LETTER AND MARTELL'S APPENDIX
Enclosed are the comments I have prepared in response to Mitchell's
letter and Martell's appendix. These were assembled from your input,
as well as from other sources.
In reply to Geesaman's appendix I plan to use our response from the
LMFBR PFEIS; similarly I plan to include WASH-1320, LA-5810 and the
British MRC report in response to the NRDC comments.
Since DNA needs this material by Wednesday, April 2, and since it
must be revised according to your comments, would it be possible
for you to review this immediately and return your comments by
COB Tuesday, April 1? My apologies for the short time frame, but
my lead time, especially with lab replies, wasn't much longer.
Please review for accuracy, completeness, responsiveness, etc.
If you feel the response is unnecessarily thorough, please
discuss,
a
Ay
L% ce liMWalkhety, £
Bruce W. Wachholz, Ph.D. ~
Biomedical Programs
Division of Biomedical and
Environmental Research
,
Enclosure:
As stated
°
DOCUMENT DOES NOT CONTAIN ECI
Reviewed weOPAAB.pate ELL)
REPOSITORY
PNNL .
COLLECTION Marsha |]
BOX No.
FOLDER
Lslands
IGES5
we
Free
Joye.» P44
Phy;