Warren D. Johnson ~ 4 - to be disposed by removing some of the plutonium from the soil. Whether such reduction is economically sound would depend on the final disposal method and its associated cost. Should deep ocean burial be the chosen method, the removal of plutonium from the soil would not be a cost effective action. -In recognition of the above points, DNA should plan its cleanup and disposal actions as if no additional guidance from AEC may be forthcoming. Any results of a further AEC study to determine the possibility of reducing the volume of plutonium-contaminated material should be viewed as an added benefit. Our discussions with staff of the Department of the Interior during the September 1974 visit to Enewetak Atoll indicated that a group of people from Ujelang Atoll will be allowed to return to Japtan Island before cleanup operations begin. In a July 18, 1974 letter to the Department of the Interior, AEC presented its views on the safety aspects of any proposed early return of people to Japtan. We view an early return as a significant step that should be treated in the DEIS. . 7 Sincerely, ames L. Liverman sistant General Manager for Biomedical and Environmental Research and Safety Programs Enclosure: Staff Report cc: Council on Environmental Quality, w/encl. (5) Fe aw