As Jim pointed cut yesterday, there wuld be discontinuities in the free air because of the way turbulence acta, that is the finite size of the eddys involved. But I wouldn't expect to have the big differences which are due to the big differences in rain. When looking at the Thunderstorm Project reports, where they have the very fine network of rain gauges, you remember the extreme grediants of rainfall in the rather mall area that cocurred there. WEXLER: These are the eastern Massachusetts resulte someone spoke about the other day ~ showed a terrific variability of radioactivity in a small eres, eastern Massachusetts - ZRXEE: VOTCEs On the ground. WEXLER: - expressed in terns of ocunts per liter of rain, as I wider~ stands now that indicated s terrific fine structure of thse distribution of this aloud which is exactly what Jim Edinger illustrated in the first slide ve have shown. And the thing I'm at a loses at you understand, Will, is how you can with the present network, open network, ever hope to get thie fins structure that is shown up by means of the ground samples and aleo from what you'd expect of Jim Edinger's arguaent. So therefore, if you can't get the fine structure, you have to be content with getting scue crude approximation as to, say, whether most of the activity is within layers likely to be einai el re DOE ARCHIVES