‘TEMA TALG G8
"GROUP1
| TIME OF PEAK DEPRESSION
100)
(oars 3975)
-
90h
1
BIO wc
-
“
r
nn
f
a.
z
.
ber we
.
c
ow
coe toe ties cori plete date available on human
a
heoigs exposed m the high sublethal range.
Isof
EXPUSURE DAY [6S
L
3
a
£ <
.
$
2
_. woe
5
NEUTROPHILES
3
aumutative- Age> Ss
It
tportance, therefore, to examine the
rosent resuits in conjunction with past experipor car effort to gain a better understanding
Tone dpraatologieal response of human beings
Vpesedota penefrating radiation in the subhoor Pate
ROWE OB
i
JO
‘hades tive been possible, and thus they com-
voy
sHOUP .
5
-—o
ISR EN TIONS
-
boone following cliscussion it will be genersted that the hematological effects
eres sere die primary to the penetrating
oO
|
@
S$
@
So
6
0
@
4
75
:
a
HEUTROPHO ES oi"
FIGURE 4.8. —-('untudadit
owe at
f tRongelapy) at the fore
eed ate aitentirw atten
opty
sete’ s Page fad vid
PT ly thee
WS Bh
orgies
It is seen thatan tertis ©
ehildren showed ao
lymphocyte count.
aeoso;dte cous,
create:
luxpuessed
control, all elements were
is percent a?
itbected juore mark
edly in the younger age groap
wonld indicate that
fe
lepresson of ‘he
These resilt-
diildren tre more sensit ve
to radiation, or that other 6 olowien: or phy <i
eal factors resulted 1 icv ve itivets greater effect
One physical consideration that may have
counted In part for the apoarent v preater dose
received by the childre: nvoalves a -onsidera
tion of dose distribu: to:
Tae body
Beca ase
of their relatively sa: aiueter. tie dose rp
verved at the center cf tee coe yo a enilad would
be wreater than for ar
uh a ooxposed ta
sume dose as measured fre
4.4
4.41
te
i
bo oto five lesions during the third, fourth
hoa? ft week. tut is vonsidered not to have
citi ited stumficantiv ta depression of any
momento ements (Chaprer 3). The degree
Hoourerns | contamination with fission products
(ooapter 4 was probably too small te con-
rovite steniicantly to the early hematological
obiserved.
Although if is not possible
ests with certumty that these added factors
beet atertally affect the hematological pat-
othect.
vers seer ot will become evident in the discus«oy Tat the chounges observed are not incon-
~ enowith “hose to be expected from exposure
oenetrat ne
Io tet Soasys
:
exert
oe
paring the present resu ts
alone.
Thus,
the
Piddia radsatver, delivered ata rapidly defeas ast fore mite over a period of approxt-
otateans
General
An estimation of the
radiation
moiatolasrie: | cf anges noted are considered to
noo rosidt of a single exposure to penetrating
fo nless otherwise stated all dis-
aero owe dp be omuited to the older-age subdime
f tren 7,
‘Sie rr one pal sources of previous data availpoe Tore anomrison. and the characteristics and
Duiscussior:
(umage meurred cue
The beta radiation
plat’ oof tle skin may have contributed to
lotions mu tie white count during the pe-
Soheifth tor elintionn recerved,
oot
radiator,
*
of each are summarized in Table
Perisvlof che table will make apparent
otticultes
uvelved in attempring strict
ecu
Colipeatisohs: fewever, some statements ean be
a ty preysous hers
inde despre the obvious linmiitations. For
mov #ference. ormal” values for peripheral
oa tempted
tological dattuoon fot
cacy
present data represen
bck
Which systematic se 7° 4
mbt
by
xpostire
ye
Garg. serie. s
a theo sade
ot
bee cor ute. from the present data and frou
berm pure are
presented in “Tapie 4 11,