aren
defects,

.

that @ complete appruach to risk assessment at the

time of

exposure must involve the HSEF for cells,
Since the HSEF approach could replace the present approaches using LET,
it has significance with respect to differences in “track structure” seen
with radiations of different “quality".

Some of the severity of cellulac

effect that has been ascribed to LET and track structure differences, may
well be due

to a difference

in dose

to

the cells.

With most,

particularly

planned transfers of chromosomal agents, it has been more or less generally *
accepted that a larger dose will he more effective per unit dose than a
smaller one, apparently with Little or no necessary requirement being
percelved to investigate why.
The interpretation of a “linear, non-threshold” curve (for exposure
and not dose) also changes with the HSEF apprdach.
following any amount of population exposure,

there of course can be

stochastic interactions with health consequences.
amount”,

i.28.,

as little as a single encounter,

the conditions for this are

1) one must

That is to say,
It is true that “any

could be lethal.

However,

first have experienced such an

encounter, and 2) It must be of a size such that the dose

.

transferred is

large enough to have some tangible probability of causing a quantal
response,
REFERENCES

1.

Parker, H. and Roesch, W.C,
X Rays and Gamma Rays.

2.

In Clark, G.L. (€d.) The Encyclopedia of

Chapman and Wall, London; Reinhold, NY, 1963.

Skarsgard, L.D., Kihlman, B.A. et al.

‘Survival,

chromosome

abnormalities and recovery in heavy fun and X-irradtated cells.

Rad...

Res., Suppl. 7, 2U8-221, 1967.
3.

Morstin, K., et al.

,

A probabilistic approach to relate

microdosimetry, biological effects and radiation quality.

Submitted

Se

to Radiation Research,

4,

Rossi, H.H.

Specification of radiation quality.

Radiat. Res. 10,

522-531, 1959.
De

Rossi, H.H.

Energy distribution in

the adsorption of

radiation.

Advances in Biological and Medical Physics, Vol. I1, pp. 27-85, 1967. “%
6.

Rossi, H.W.

Radiation Dosimetry, Vol.

Eds., Academic Press, NY) 1968,

-226-

I (FH. Attix, W.C. Roesch,

Fe

Select target paragraph3