(
C
,
-
34
e oe
we
aa
12
of individual doses is not contemplated,Ose
Actual doses received by individuals will vary according to age,
size, metabolism, and customs, as well as variations in their environment.
These variations are_said tomake it impossible to determine
en
the maximum individual doses.
~
ad Pa
es
Su!
In practice it is feasible to take
™
account of these sources of variability by the selection of appropriate
|,
7
critical groups within the population, provided the critical group is
small enough to be homogeneous with respect to age, diet and those
aspects of behavior that affect the doses received.
Such a group
should be representative of those individuals in the population expected
ICRP believes that it will be reasonable to
A
The inate variability within an apparently homogeneous group means
that some members of the critical group will receive doses somewhat
At the very low levels of risk implied, the
‘
health consequence is likely to be minor whether the dose limit is marginally or substantially exceeded.
Limitation of exposure of whole popuiations is achieved partly by
limiting the individual doses and partly by limiting the number of persons exposed.
Y
It is of the utmost importance to avoid actions that may
prove to be a serious hazard later, when correction may be impossible
or costly.
¥y
Ny.
,
ft
Re
ok
oo
.
te
~—
win Chae
ae
'
a ee
oF vee
La
tse —
peel
.
i
wp
ae] ett
ate OU
sear asey,
ae
‘os
$ ke
.
.
7a
—
8 Ee
ye.
‘
,
:
*y i
~
os
cee
a “ee
Ne
Core we te
done ERY Rays7
A
”
:
’
‘|
DOL ve ae
f
oor aed
peeOe «wl
'
*
“CA ; eit
Y cues,
HA
.
er A ~
6
af Lat
a
diauer ¢
w 209)
/
arrve
wl
.
"ror
:
,
- 8
coe
}
.
aieation «4s
rae He
we
META
DS
a‘ Tete HT asoP
jPee
_
eee
wi EX seo {
hegre
Remreranar aie PES
wk et
cts |{poe
re
:
ine
higher than the dose limit.
%
dose of this group.
ne eee
apply the appropriate. dose limit for members of the public to the mean
— —-
to receive the highest dose.
*
py beg an ee!
.
et
.
“tp ~\
fe
~
an
oe
~
;
‘
wat
eden
joo
: