7
J
TT
“|
10.0 --
—
4
-“”
+
yg
x
Vey
oy
a
L
*
“
w
pre-e
aw
on ~~
*.
*
‘
NEUTROPHILS
4
’®
re
rN
4
» |
|
L
4
Oo
&
24
40
DAYS
56
7
6
|
2
3
4
5
MO
YEARS
TIME AFTER EXPOSURE
-3
LEUKOCYTES
LL
6
!
10
oO
!
20
j
30
1
J}
40
50 60 70
AGE (YR)
years post exposure. Stars represent mean values of comparison population.
@
0
T
TT
mT
T
———T
T
T
fF
|
80
L
930
Figure 34. Neutrophil counts of exposed Rongelap individuals plotted against age at 5 years post exposure, 1959.
Solid line represents meanlevel ofcomparison population.
4
a a
8.0b
L
ts
wo
7.0r °
1
n
7
$
.
oO 6.0F og
*~
bd
n 80F = 8
Mh
LYMPHOCYTES x 107°
TTS
WO
Figure 33. Mean neutrophil and white blood cell counts
of exposed Rongelap people from exposure through 6
Ke
tt
oOo
&
24
1
1
40
DAYS
}
4
56
1
JA
72
Al
&
& 40r
i
|
2
MO
3
4
5
6
x
YEARS
oT
100
qT
J
}
PERIOD MINIMUM
COUNTS
(DAYS 31-59)
ch
aoe
7% 20
Po]
oO
A
1
TS
a
4
:.
UNEXPOSED
0
=
e
°
‘
*
e
e
ee*
jot
10 20
7
e
~
e
Lor
Figure 35. Mean lymphocyte values of exposed Rongelap
people from exposure through 6 years post exposure. Stars
represent mean values of comparison population.
|
.
8
=
TIME AFTER EXPOSURE
CUMULATIVE PERCENT
TTT
NEUTROPHILS x iO
.
6
ph
LEUKOCYTES AND NEUTROPHILS x 107?
12.0
*
4
“
e
tt
ot
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
AGE (YR)
Figure 36. Lymphocyte counts of exposed individuals
plotted against age at 5 years post exposure, 1959. Solid line
represents mean counts of comparison population.
BO
60
40
7.
4 RONGELAP UNEXPOSED
O 5 YRS POST EXPOSURE
20
o4
A|
20
jo
|
,
28
36
44
52
#60
LYMPHOCYTES x107?
L
68
l
76
Figure 37, Cumulative distribution curve,
Rongelap lymphocytes, 1959.
2
Qo
“ mat
LJ
"
an
ee
&—""
aw
a
»,
eee
-
a
_
MALES (AGE >10)
ut
t10b
=
a
oli
08
he
24
i
40
DAYS
1d
56
A
72
6
It
_—_L
2
1
3
MO
YEARS
TIME AFTER EXPOSURE
1
4
1
5
Figure 38. Mean platelet values of exposed Rongelap .
people from exposure through 5 years post exposure. Stars
represent mean values of comparison population.