ve-ti-3

SLNANdOTSAaG INSYHND

Tbad Wom 2.

‘Pable VII

mo

Public Health Gains and Cost Under Alternative Regulatory Approeches
Humber of

‘Annualized Cost of ~ Reduction in Annual

Requisted Smelters#

Required Controls

:

Convercter-Operationar

EPA's Proposed Rule

seOdey wWeWUOHAUy

- EPA's Alternative
Population Cutoff:

Se “
3
Bo

Matte and Slag

Operations:

EPA's Alternative

"

,

|

$l.

EPA‘s Alternative
Risk/Exposure Cutoff

5

i.

we

1,2

;

1

”

l

’

:

*

°

a

+ 0.93

.

"

‘

:

CO

-

Avecage Cost

(Jal illons/cancec)
:

.

.

s .
oe yo &.008

Coe.
‘81.4

(saliflon/cancect

’

Low

a

:
7.0

_.

heh

.

ss
—- ~ 670.8
oo.
~1=

mo
160.6

. - an
7.05 - s |) 920.8

.

.

i

Re

0.0075

Range tn Cost

Per CancerAvoided

SF
'
7.0

Do
"$2.0

... +. 6,003! 5
~ *

-

Per Cancer Avoided -

ye
_"966.

.
8.097
.

.

pe

-

an

a.

pO,
Tr,

O92-

es

Population Cutoff

:

:

on,
ae: woke
i
GU
-0.061
7.9

Tt

s

(cancers/yeac)

ca

:
re
6 8,089:

Do

EPA's Alternative Tt
Risk/Exposuce Cutoff
5

EPA's Proposed Rule

.

oe
ok

.

oe

‘(doflaceIn afitlon)”

Incidence of Cancer

.

298.0°
BS

358.70
116.0

”
7

:

‘

-

7.0

1,300.0

7.0

3,388.0

7,0

296.6

7

|

Select target paragraph3