SESSION I

19

There was still manifested, I believe, some of the hostility which

had arisen in certain Japanese scientific circles in the years imm-diately after the wac. Most of the physicians with ABCC, and, in

fact, most of the American physicians who went to Japan couldn't

communicate effectively with their Japanese colleagues, few of whom
spoke English, The language of medicine in Japan has been German,
and only recently has English come to play a prominent role in the
exchange of medical information, It was not easy under circumstances
such as these to establish rapport. The situation with respect to genetics was quite different. This was ascribable to a number of largely
fortuitous happenings. First, there was a firmer body of experimental information from which to attempt extrapolations to Hiroshima

and Nagasaki, and even to the members of the crew of the Fukuryu

Maru, Second, many of the Japanese geneticists of stature at that
time nad been trained either in the United States or in Europe, and

as a consequence we often spoke a common language, namely, Eng-

lish, Japanese geneticists, in general, strongly supported ABCC's
genetics program; whereas the endorsement tha* was being given to

medicine, for example, was of a more qualified nature.

The absence

ofa strong endorsement encouraged opportunists and oppo *tunism,
and the Fukuryu Maru incident was replete with both.

The emotional climate that was created in Japan when word reached

there of the Fukuryu Maru was really a very strange and almost un-

believable one. Rightly or wrongly, I'm inclined to ascribe it in
large part to the "devil's brew'' to which I have previously referred.
The newspapers seized upon the incident and began a drumfire of
daily accounts which almost seemed intentionally designed to heighten

anxieties, real or fancied.

The Japanese government as well as our

own had effectively lost control of the situation.
“grabbed the ball and wererunning with it."

The newspapers had

I can recall quite vividly some of the headlines which appeared.
There was one, for example, in the Osaka English-language Mainichi;
the headline said; 'WBC counts of fish-eaters rise."' It appeared
shortly after it had been announced that radioactively contaminated
fish had accidentally reached the Osaka market, and that some had
been inadvertently sold, A few individuals who had presumably eaten
the fish were being studied by local authorities. This headline accompanied a report of their work which, by theway, was unobjectionable. They had carefully indicated that numerous factors could produce a rise in white blood cells, including upper respiratory infections
so common at that time of year: they further stated that on this account

one could not conclude that the elevation was necessarily due to the

Select target paragraph3