SESSION II

.

75

prolong and prolong, indefinitely, this mass hysteria into a very real
international problem
CONARD: I would like to add a postscript to what Merril was saying in regard to the examination of the fishermen,
In 1964 I was invited to go to Japan to examine the Japanese fishermen. I think this is the first time since you were there, Merril, that
this invitation had been extended. When [arrived there I was surprised also, as you said, with the amount of pre:s coverage, a large
number n.: sting the plane. I was taken to the American Embassy
and they wanted to know exactly what it was all about and what we
intended to do and say, and so forth, They seemed to be satisfied
that everything was all right. And so we proceeded with the examinations at Yaizu. Dr. Kumatori (Reference 6) was the Japanese phy-

sician who was ir charge of the examinations.

Everything went along fine except that <verywhere we went in
Japan we were besieged with reporters and television people who
made a big to-do over the whole thing. Certainly it was apparent
that even at that time, 10 years after the accident, the Japanese were
still very sensitive about anything that had to do with radiation and
particularly fallout.
ROOT: I think this sensitivity, this continuing sense of outrage,
persistently stimulated by the press, and exploited by political parties, stems directly from the 1954 shot and was exacerbated by our
handling of it. I was in Japan in 1964. Asa journaiist I made contacts through fellow journalists with many officials, doctors, and
scientists. They were far from reticent in our discussions.
They
may have been more outspoken with me because I came with their
own friends or acquaintances and was not on an officia: mission or
connected with government activity. They told me that the widespread
reaction of horror crystallized into anti- American sentiment; channeled into political segments; mobilized women who had never before
had any political interest; infuriated the whole country. Many called
it the third U.S. atomic attack,
FREMONT-SMITH:
ROOT:

This one?

Yes, Bravo.

FREMONT-SMITH:

More so than Hiroshima?

Select target paragraph3