5. The elimination from the Task Group of a J=2 Section which
represented the AEC has made it impossible for the Task‘Group to
confirm the security clearance status of its own people. This
situation has occasionally resulted in embarrassment or delay
of official visiters, etc., since direct commnications between
|
1
"
.
this headquarters “and & requestor of security information could
not be used,
For futureoperation, at is recounended that a
AEG Security Branch’exployee be attached to 10 7.1 Headquarters
.
to handle confirmation of clearances,
-
6. The errival of military personnel who have notret been grantedan AEC Q Clearancehas, been a problem,as at!was during i
cateof
IvY. Hq:oF has “subdeeded,in arrangingwithWaskington Area'! ae
erat)
.
»
Security ‘Operations’sid the‘military services‘to facilitatepee
the handling of Q Clearances |‘and overall’ experiences thus tes oe
reel
“at
pave shoim’ an‘tnproveaentover IVY. However, in severalinstances;
Sere Ny
ReBS
| persciinel.havearrived’herewithout Q‘Cheetinces.Tha omuses
ae ce
vee,
Rebs ce "oe!
| a miltiple Froblea.in (faat‘te"aubjectceaaseune“the dutiesa,
é ge
‘- \t
~#
for isto, he was.‘assigned
toieorem, he matPena
4idle aMe oe 2
mt eleareas’‘be cannotbe’asigned housing.(normally) at.oo "
‘Les Aimos,“ana mst beteaporerity ressiigied to a militery
N ‘
£
unit at Sandia Base atidgieared, then brought back when .
§
;
cleared, au tate oniéedot only unjustifiable expense ta
x 4
the government, but enbarrassing incidents when prospective ©
Q y
employing offices see the JTF send a man who is not permitted
to go to work because security requirements have not been
,
satisfied, This has occasioned much time-consuming and
costly commmication, usually not effective.
eee
ae
It is of
"