evidence is not particularly helpful in deciding specific causation
in any individual."

Both of these statements are incorrect.

First,

it is well known that epidemiologic studies have documented that
radiation not only causes

cancer but also that radiation causes

cancer of specific histologic type.
In fact, there can be little doubt that, under a wide variety
of circumstances,
in humans.

ionizing radiation is carcinogenic and leukomogenic

This conclusion is supported by numerous evidemiologic

Studies conducted among human populations

Giversity of exposure to radiation.

which have experienced a

Epidemiologic studies of

uranium miners exposed to alpha and gamma radiation have demonstrated
a large excess of bronchogenic cancer.

In addition, these studies

have demonstrated a preponderance of a specific

histologic type of

cancer, viz small cell undifferentiated carcinoma, when compared to
the general population.

Epidemiologic studies of the survivors of

the atomic bomb explosians at Hiroshima and Nagasaki provide reliable
data on the carcinogenic effects of whole body exposure to camma rays

and neutrons.

Among those individuals, an excess of lung, thyroid

and breast cancer, as well as leukemia, has been demonstrated.

This

excess of leukemia was shown to be predominantly of the myelogenous
and granulocytic type.

Conclusive evidence that therapeutic radia-

tion can be carcinogenic and leukomogenic comes from studies of
patients irradiated for ankylosing spondylitis, thymic

enlargement

and gynecological disorders.

In like manner, epidemiologic studies

have shown that radiologists

exposed to radiation have an excess of

leukemia when compared to other physicians not so exposed.

Select target paragraph3