My
if
ot
Te
ee
_—
m
hee ay
theAECpresented witha
.
7
Lote
a re:
eh
when it dia required to act on the ono hand as an
agent in developing nuclea: weapons, andion tty
othe: hand as an agont in providing sefoguarde
against weapon hazards?
If e conflict doos cyist,
what would be effective waye of removing or ri. tanec!
minimising it}
ore ee eee wee ae
low much of the research jn being done ly tha pute:
mant eud how much by private rescarobe groups wndor
govornaent sponsorship and with governmont funds?
Je
[
Are there serious soft spots in either the expori.montal or theoretical aspects of tho solences relate)
to fallout; in partioular aro there any that Uinilt.
a thorough understanding of the ojvildan and milliary
polloy implications of the fallout problom’
he
How well is the resoarch program in balanoco?
5.
Is the general level of the renearch program adoqun'+
in view of the obvious policy implications of fellent
in such areas 48 veapons testing, nucloar worpons
banning, oividl defense, the stockpile epontrum an!
tho associated production capability?
JCAE
Is the scope of inquiry broad enough so that it ir
not likely that the U.S. could be surprised by an
enany using the propertlos of fallout in a sanner
that we have no notion of how to cope with?
|