nw
te
i
nod
d
ope
Lok
oie ig
'
: oe
V
‘prediot with:a certainty appropriate for policy-making
ee
purposes the‘same sort of information (as discussed above)
for future firings?
i.
Is the prediction possible even assuming unlimited
information concerning the firing charaoterss ties’?
ce me a te ae
“a
How would it be made?
Re
Ie 0 postulated zate of firing (yield per unit Lin}
meaningful7
What does "present rate of firing" meen’
Is a postulated rate of firing sufficient informits: \
Sl eage i
by iteelf for making,the prediction named here?
Je
How does one take into account suoh problems es dlr:
sites of firing, firing of woapons whose charactoric' ten
are not known, differances in weapons typo and burs'
4.
Are the present orlteria for biological damago ond a7.
the moasurements pertaining to biological dameys
adequate so that one could predict, with tho cortainty
named above tho future hagord, if any, owing to fntura
woapon firings, even If he could forecast how ruch
fallout there would be and whet would happen to it?
If thay are adequate, what ia the pattorn for putt!s.
thom together?
5.
JCAE
Jf one had before himself a vorking definition of
hazayg that was oatisfactory from a morn). or othier?.
social, political, and economic point of view, an’ */
this definition was stated in terms of meanureable or
observable phenomena in nature (including man), do--
i?