-4-

Acting Administrator

pro:

This option is compatible with the recent ERDA philosophy
outlined in the lab and field report which emphasizes the
impurtance of regional manazement. Under this concept an
authoritative, responsible full t.me offieial would be

colocated with our Pacific Support Base which is close to

the ocene of many complex Pacific activities. Headquarters
direction would be addressed to a single manager who would

be responsible for attending to conflicts and ambiguities

rather than having them (as now) go unresolved |or having
resolution attempted at the field project level].

con:

This option would require one additional Federal position
at the GS 15 or 16 level.

Option B:
Determine that it is not in the interest of ERDA‘s
programs in the Pacific to assign one Headquarters’ personnel as
field cuoordinator and manager of the AES activities.
pro;

No «ction is required to implement this option.
position is required.

No Federal

con:

A continuation of an uncoordinatei program would not gain
the maximum efficiency of the funling.

Discussion

This requested action ia not a recent develovment as the enclosed letter
of 2/74 shows there have been three years of staff considerations of
these aspects by AES. As the position of Di-ector of MPML is vacant
now, end the clean-up activities of DOD are »eing formulated, it is

requested that this action be expedited ag soon as possible.

In addition, there are some <iministrative advantages of a focused
ERDA program in this area as illustrated by two lawsuits.
In October,
1975, a law suit was filed on behalf of the people of Bikini in the
Federal District Court in Hawait against the Administrator of ERDA
and other U.S.A, officials as defendents.
It was alleged that the Federal government was responsible for
numerous failures and daficiencies in dealing with the people of
Bikini. In November, 1976, an attormey for the people of Utirik
filed an administrative claim with the Administrator (and also the
Secretary of Interior) for $100,000,000, This was allegedly due Co
individual and community damages resulting from nuclear atmospheric
tests.

|

OFFICE >

SURNAME p>
DATE >
Form AIC-J18 (Rey. 9-53) AECM 0240
4
.

Boteri.

t

.

Ww U. @: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE! 1974-%24-166
st
mete
.
t
,

Nt

ogtee

.

.

.

Poet: gp ery eee,
4
met
a.

Siw.

.

_*

Select target paragraph3