31/30

1/.4U

BSL RAUL.

old ZoZz SoLY

Ott

UU

LF

Current Status of the Plutonium Level in
the Rongelap and Utirik Urine Samples.
Executive Summary
At 6:45 a.m.

the morning of March 1,

1954, a nuclear device,

Code-named

Bravo, was tested at Bikini Atoll. Unexpected weapon yield and tropospheric
transport caused radioactive fallout to sweep over Rongelap and Utirik Atolls,
100 miles east from Bikini,

a few hours later.

As a result,

thirty-five years

following this incident, we are still studying the Northern Marshall Islands'
radiological environments and evaluating the radiological impact on the
Marsnall Islands people.
As part of this effort,

a comprehensive safety and dose reassessment

project was conducted by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) scientists
beginning in 1981.
Based both of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory's (LLL)

environmental measurements of air, water, food, and soil samples and the BNL‘s
whole-body counting measurements, we presented a table of average annual
effective dose equivalents (mrem/yr) from internal and external radiation (not

including the dose from plutonium) to the people living at Rongelap Atoll.
The total 3U years dose living on Rongelap Island was projected to be of less
than 5,000 mrem. This is below the 170 mrem/yr of United States federal
radiation protection guidelines for members of the public.

On May 1985, the people of Rongelap choose to leave their homeland and
relocate on Majatto Island although the living conditions on Majatto were
inferior to those on Kongelap. The basis for their relocation was never

communicated to us, but it seem reasonable to assume that it may have been
over their concern of plutonium in the environments taken from our polonium
biased plutonium data in late 1984 from the Photon Electron Rejection Alpha

Liquid Scintillation (PERALS) analytical methods.

In March 1, 1989, Dr. Kohn used the dose rate table mentioned above in
his "“Rongelap Reassessment Project Report."
He showed that even using the

1987 maximum transuranic activity (5 fCi/sample) we found in urine, the

estimated committed dose (i.e., the total dose to be received over the next 50
years), internal and external, from 1978 to 2008 still falls below an average

of 170 mrem/yr.

As a result of our extensive evaluation of existing plutonium
measurement for ultra-low activities in urine, a detection sensitivity of
about 100 aCi/liter using fission track analytical (FTA) method was
established at BNL in 1986. As of December 1988, over 500 urine samples

collected from 1981 to 1984 from the Rongelap and Utirik people was
completed.
These measurements have met rigorous quality assurance standards

for chemical analysis. However, some inconsistencies still existed in the FTA
data which we presented during the Livermore meeting in February 1988.
Furthermore,

all the 1988 urine samples (67 samples from the Rongelap

people and 101 samples from the Utirik people) taken by Dr. Sun last
September were just analyzed. The results support the thesis that soil
contamination in some of the earlier urine samples was giving false
information.
Because of Dr. Sun’s careful attention to collecting

Select target paragraph3