86 | DR. 2 DUNHAM: Is there any comparable data on large animals? 8 ODR. CRONKITE: “4 f#sgroup. Yes, we have 150 r dogs in a large They hit the minimum around 12 to 13 days, and are beginning to repver at abput the time these people are gettin the minimum values. It is an entirely different picture. q I don't Know how to interpret these things. It may be 8 that the life span of human cells is entirely different from 9 laboratory animals that we are dealing with, or there is 10 some other wetrd radiological factor that comes in of eZ 11 additivity that prolongs the effect of radiation. O|. 12 confused on it. ge 4s oo 5 og o5 me I am > DR. DUNHAM: It seemed to me in our little 53 14 discusion this morning we talked about somebody reviewing = 15 the Japanese data, and iff it looked as though in those 16 that survived there was the prolonged effect. 17 Argonne cases there was prolonged effect. 18 are CDR. CRONKITE: In the two The bad effect on Japanese data 19 is that those who survived the first blood count were taken 20 in the third and fourth week after exposure. 21 know what they were doing before thet. The Japanese dying 22 probably received super-lethal doses of radiation, 73 behavior is the same as that of a dog receiving super-lethal 24 dose of radiation. 26 four weeks where you have to guess what that looks like. We don't the Then there is this hiatus of three or