77 1 fa tients who was working as a, luminous dial worker at 15 2 had areas of increased intensity around epiphyseal areas of the long bones. 4 a) that we were not too sure whether these developed years later or developed with deposition. Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C, 6 Gross audio-radiographs were made, and they did havp 7 a concentration of radium in the epiphyseal area. 8 trouble with the radium data is that we don't have a roentgen 9 grosser so that we can tell these tievelopments of the roentgepnographic lesions, we see in the people 20 or 30 years from 11 now. It would seem that these lesions develop years later. 12 As I say, in this one case which ingested radio- 13 active materials at 15 died at 40, and she had these areas 14 of concentration in the epiphyseal areas. 15 studies, it would seem that radium is eliminated from the 16 more accessible parts of the skeleton. DR. BUGHER: From other Does anybody else have a different 18 thought in regard to the skeletal prognosis here with this 19 amount of material? 20 I think the skin prognosis is one which has a 21 considerable uncertainty as well, and also equally perhaps 22 important. 23 I would like to ask Dr. Dunhan to serve as Chairman fora 74 while until I get back. 5 side from the skin. Department of Fy -” . The big 10 M7 ARC This, with other data, would suggest + Historian's ARCHES I have toskip over to a Commission meeting, so You can go on with this prognostic I think also there should be some | |