36 1 On looking over carefully previous data from the 2] Japanese and accidents that have occurred at Los Alamos 3 and Argonne, 4] before, although not emphasized. to this has in general been composed of very small exposure 6 groups even in the Japanes, while the total exposure group 7 followed may have been in the hundreds. 8 at a given time were done o a very few individuals, as low 9 as two out of the group. Actually the counts So it is difficult to make an accurate comparison between the two exposure groups. In thecase of the Argonne accidents, we have to 12 compare our data with one or 13 dose range. two individuals from a comparabl 14 We attempted to make some correlations between 15 skin lesions, depilation, and various parameters derived 16 from the blood counts. 7 fruitful. 18 between hematological changes or skin or depilation changes. 19 Ww it Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C Actually the data previous 5 10 ARC it appears that perhaps this has been observed All efforts in this respect were not We were unable to evolve any correlation at all One final note on the hematology. The time trends, 20 as has been pointed out, are essentially identical to that 21 of an individual exposed at Argonne National Laboratory, who 22 received an estimated 190 REP of radiation. 28 for this individual to date has been excellent, and we hope 74 that this may be an indication that with these individuals The prognosis 25 c ASO the prognosis will be excellent. Denartment mrp § ae For : 1 4 ry i: woo al Histon! S ara O fed rae ea iSeav 7 wv 39