225 1 , portions of any fruit. DR. BUGHER: That is interesting. I had the impression that the cocoanuts also were showing activity. 4 | But the sap of the palm did, is that correct? og KR. COHN: 6 - Yes. CDR. CRONKITE: Is there any possiblity that those q samples could have gctten mixed up? 8 juguru that was sitting out in the open, and there were 9 other samples that were taken from the palm. 10 HR. COHN: There was one sample of We have three samples from Rongelap g 11 and three from Uterik, and they are all pretty consistent. 5° 12 The Uterik samples are one third of the activity of the a8 13 Rongelap. Pe 14 3 15 samples of material that had been exposed for five or six 16 weeks, and one sample from Rongelap and on from Uterik which 17 was collected fresh, and they were » labeled. LT, CHAPMAN: 18 19 the container or anything. MT. CHAPMAN: No, sir. 21 CDR. CONARD: Only in the one sample there was no question of contamination. 83 24 ye eS No question of contamination from 20 22 arc DR. BUGHER: In each instance there were two LT. CHAPMAN: HR, COHN: No, we took our own containers. The activity was of the level of one 25 _microcurie per liter, and that is away above the external rc ye ~ | ' ou 22!