211, MR. IMIRIE: There is one thing that comes to my mind, Dr. Bugher, and I have talked to Merril Eisenbud about it, Harley and Dr, Dunning; there has been a question from every survey group that went out as to what readings wereat various points. Of course, we all know what happened on these readings. In some cases there were uncalibrated instanc et and in other cases they were two feet from. the ground or thred feet from the ground or near the water or under a "hot". It ig Washington, D. C. Alderson Reporting Company trw that is where the people were. 10 there was an aerial survey taken which indicated a little 11 higher r than most of the ground surveys. 12 would tend to integrate the average dose on the entire island 138 as compared to searching out hot spots and cold spots. 14 for nothing else, it would give an inter-comparimn of 15 one island between another island or one atoll against another 16 atoll on an average integrated basis. 17 18 19° If two readings of aerial survey might prove out or disprove the centimeter which was used. MR, HARLEY: We have data here, for example, on Rongelap taken at 32 hous, one with a T-1-B, and the other 21 with the scintillater or from the air, and the difference 23 ARC 24 25 Monartmont of Energy at “a Ba Further than that, The aerial survey 20 22 Prt But in addition to that, between was essentially nothing. DR. DUNNING: It is less than 5 per cent. Yes, but I was out there and the first comparisons I made were between the air and the ground and differed by a factor as high as four. [I have the raw ome Li Ba CG eos Sey fy [7 a ae A(R