176 will not be meaningful. A If it is wmntrolled, it is more significant than bone marrow biopsies as far as the red cell cycle is concerned. DR. BUGHER: Are there any other comments in regard to the hematological studies, and things tha should be done? If not, then the dermatological side. The skin studies mentio: net included biopsies if the latter are indicated. That is an evasivecase. Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C CDR. CONARD: There are certain cases thd have nore 10 severe lesions I think should have further biopsies, 11 particularly the ones we previously biopsied. 12 interesting to followthem and see what later biopsies show. DR. BUGHER: 138 14 It would be You can probably find the old lesion by the scar of the first biopsy. 15 CDR. CONARD: We know exactly where it is. 16 have the color pictures which we intend to take back 17 further, and take further color pictures. 18 DR. BUGHER: We So you think in terms of objective 19 photographic record with time here combined with some 20 histological work. 21 the important thing here, 22 visible change. 23 ARC I think pradably the histology would be CDR. CONARD: DR. BUGHER: even though there is no grossly Yes, sir. Are there other comments? If not, what is your feeling about the ocular [tana Por 20qyy ieee eb at Eyqagens /.