15
read 98 r.

However,

,

in checking with their actual movement,

it would appear that these three Army personnel did not
remain there all of the time.

In fact, they were back at

the other end of the Island and inside the metal buildings
for an appreciable amount of

time.

Therefore, the 98 r

probably represents the upnver limit of our estmate.
I would like to give you very firm figures,

but I

think you can appreciate the problem, that this isabout as
firm as you can get.

Alderson Reporting Company
Washington, D. C.

10

maybe we already have

stuck our necks out too far.
DR. BUGHER:

11

Do you have any estimate of the range

12

here within which the dose pobably falls?

13

anything that woul) resemble a standard error?
DR. DUNNING:

14

In other words,

I was afraid you would ask that.

15

Frankly, I don't.

16

up with a range.

17

I was afraid people would read into that an implication of

18

a standard deviation.

19

enough.

20

As Dr. Sondhaus has indicated, they came

I have deliberately not put one in, because

I just don't think the dataare firm

To make the matter still worse, m this agenda, we

21

give an estimate of

22

problem among other things of beta-gamma ratio, whichis,

23

af

ARC
24

of Fa
Departmant

In fact,

25

ae ama?

surface dose.

This is getting into the

course, exceedingly difficult to evaluate.
If I may just mention, we have some

very limited

data on the Japanese fishermen, where we have some material

s OOS 4

n’
- Historia

>
rea*

*

ABulu aad

/

Select target paragraph3