125, 1 because it was written in the field. 2 good report. 3 be corrected. Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C. 4 It has a lot of inherent defects that should = Gerve .¢ I think the first I would like to see done is to 5 take the section which is now Chapter 2 on the dosimetric 6 considerations, and have that drastically reduced. 7 like tohave Dr. Sondhaus, Mr. Sharp, and Dr. Dunning try 8 to make sone very short statement that would be accep table 9 to everybody, and preferably of no classified information; I would 10 then in addition to make a separate addendum that would not 11 be in the same volume that would go into all the material 12 that is inevitably secret restricted data. 13 I think in this way it would improve the report 14] for the average biological and medical reader so as not to 15 have to wade through all the "ifs" and "ors" and "buts" and 16 come out at the end as to ‘whether or not there wasa dose or 17 not from a physical standpoint. 18 ARC It is still a pretty The next is the section en excretion and body 19 burden which represents a tremendous amount of work. 20 always a difficult thing to go through and understand. I 21 would like to give that the same sort of treatment of cutting 22 it down for our final report to a very short version, 23 emphasizing the status or the significance of the excretion 4 of the material, a statement on probably body burden, and 25 leave out for this report all of the extensive animal data; Nenartment of Energy Wotoriavs OFita It is t [2