117 1 neutrons, information which would suggest the content of Normal wanium of the device, isotope ratios of the short half life ones that particularly give information on the 41 type of device, and anything that might lead to any more 6 clear estimate of yield than has been given. I am aware that the Congress itself 7 the yield, 8 statements to the press. 9 sensitive piece of information as it was. compromised that is, members of the Joint Committee in So that cannot be regarded as a But that is the 10 sort of t thing that would bear on the questions of design, Z 11 efficiency, proportion of energy released by fission as 5 12 against thermonuclear reaction, and that sort of thing. u8 13 ae 14 isotope analyses in urine, the estimate cd body burden, and 2 15 the computations of number of fissions ingested, for 16 example, per persa, the sort of thing we have on the board 17 here. 18 it without too much restraint. | 19 ARC I don't think that inhibits one from giving the While it is classified now, I think we can declassify CDR. CRONKITE: I don't thinlm there would be any 20 difficulty in writing the report with no restricted data in 21 it. After listening to the discussion m dosimetry today, .22 IT have more or less made up my mind -+ I don't know what I 23 will be able to talk the other people into it or not -- to 74 summarize dose in one table as the best estimate and the 25 statement of the uncertainties connected with it, and then s n E of nt Lenartme teric nis. Rig R.05 08 oo | t Ro Soy 19