114 DR. BUGHER: leukemia in 100, The chance of getting a case of those people must be of the order of one in 100,000, or something of that order. If you had 100 times that probability, the chances of getting it in any one of 100 people would be quite small. So even if the leukemia rate were very much increased, you would not expect more than 7 one case, probably,and if you had one case, you would not 8 know whether to attribute it to radiation or not. 9 I would agree with that. 10 Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C Almost unlikely. There would be probably very little due to the absence of the deeper effects 14 there are no continuing ulcerations and the likelihood of 15 neoplasia is considered to be rather remote. 16 fact od the rather continuous exposure of ultraviolet may 17 increase the incidence somewhat. 20 21 22 23 24 25 Department of crersy Historian’s Gioca . CDR. CRONKITE: 13 19 ame skin carcinoma? . 12 18 abe sc aha le. What has been the feeling of the probability of 11 ARC I think | DR. BUGHER: However, the You would expect that to be much more likely to be recognized than leukemia, I take it. CDR. CRONKITE: Yes. It would be more likely, but still probably would not be a major consideration. DR. BUGHER: I don't know what the frequency of cutaneous carcinoma among these Miconesian® is. CDR, CRONKIEE: I asked about that when we were out there, and I was led to belive that of what grossly one j