1 3 received possibly were a little increased to the dental 6 germinal layer due to soft component, would there be any reason to examine these people by, say, yourself, or somebody else familiar with the radiation effects on growing teeth. 7 | ENGLISH: Judging from work we have done with swine and rodents, I don't bd ieve this 9 dose that you can expect to find enough dhange in the 10 developing teeth, after they reach maturity, that you 11 would find any changes. 122 doses of 400 r before we found anything that was very - 13 pertinent, and with rodents on their continually developing 14] incisor teeth, you get up in the nature of 1,000 r, actually 15 we used 1500 r, in order to get the stoppage of enamel 16 incidence. 17 and you would not have to go that far for record purposes as 18 a minimum change. is a sufficient With swine, we were usually up in With the rodents it is a very marked chang,e, I would strongly suspect that 150 r would not 20 show you anything. 71 of having a group whose nutritional conditions and health 22 conditiom 23 ° some minimal changes, you could not pinpoint it down to ��� Particularly would you have the trouble in general are so varied that even if there were radiation changes, Borartment of enercp | aw CAPT. 8 19 His raring 33 English whether levels of radiation such as these children 5 ARC I would like to ask Capt. 2| 4 Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C. CDR. CRONKITE: because hyperplasia can occur from sumer oof things. v / 27