UNIQUE DOCUMENT #55
\

&

pl LCP EM, OL TFA

IN REPLY REFER

U. S. NAVAL RADIOLOGICAL DEFENSE LABORATORY toris:
SAN FRANCISCO 24, CALIFORNIA
3~901-258
EPC: icm

|

Va

AC AOS

15 MAR is--

Dr. Gordon M. Dunning, Health Physicist
Biophysics Branch
Division of Biology and Medicines

Atomic Energy Commission
Washington 25, D. C.

STi RET

i
y
At

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

This is a wery late response indeed to a letter that you

wrote on September 9, 1955, asking for comments on the points you

discussed relative to my letter of August 23rd in connection with
the beta-gamma problem. On the assumption that a response may still
of some historical interest, I should like to mention the following:

&

OU!
DECLASSI
AGYae
ee

4

-

Dear Dr. Dunning:

DEPARTMENT Of

|

iow

3.
218

a. It was not our intent to criticise the actual value ef
100 to 1 beta-gamma ratio which appeared in your paper. We were merely

|{ attempting to point out that there might be some ramifications which

needed explanation or discussion, and for this we suggested reference
material such as USNRDL Technical Memoranda 218 and 24.

SS

b. As far as the variation of the beta-gamma retio with time

23 23% is eoncerned, I would suggest that you refer to a paper by Mr. C.

Sonibaus of this Laboratory, namely, USNRDL-394(1952). This paper
rresents (for fission products) a plot of a calculated beta-gamma
ratio versus time and also on the same graph shows effective gamma
and beta energy curve as a function of time.
ce.

The deviations from the g7t-2 decay law have been obtained

in field operations - See, for example, Project 2.6a: Operation CASTLE

ISTS

Fiml Report, Wr-917.

non-fission product activities for the CASTLE Bravo type contaminant.

2,
5 .
:

e. The experimental work on the penetration of radioactive
particles into clothing has not been done at this Laboratory. We would
appreciate any reference you might give us on this subject.

ef,

A

a.

kx

>

\ \

8

~

‘4

0

c0
A

2.

We have not seen any definitive results on the amount of

As was also in my letter of August 23rd, the above comments were pri-

marily formujated by Drs. J. D. Teresi and A. Breido.

“th s do ment consists of

5

8
A

Tri3 is

opy /

of 2

pages.

—

=.

G6..46

Sincerely yours,

fo
EUGENE
Associate Scientific Director

Gok bo eae HATH 8SHES 2 —
4

sr om,

verse Tee STR 7 Tepe a

ae
oe

fi

Select target paragraph3