-— SECUNDLYe THE DELEGATIONS ~ RIGHT TO FREELY CHOOSE OUx POLITICAL FUTUREe® DGREED THAT MICRONESIANS HAD TRE RIGHT TO ADOPT A CONSTITUTION AND LAWS WHICH ARE CONSISTENT WITH THEik OWN NEEOS. THIRDs THE DELEGATIONS AGREED THAT THE PEOPLE OF MICRONESIA SHOULD HAVE CONTROL OF THEIR LAND. GaLY THOSE EASES AND OPTIONS WHICH WERE NEGOTIATED AS PART OF COMPACT wDULD FALL UNDER UseSe AUTHORITY. WOULD Ovi THE OTHERWISEs ONLY MICRCNESIANS - MICRONESIAN LAND AND ONLY FICRONESIANS KOULD EXCERCISE THE © POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN "THE PROGRESS MALE AT HANA IN SECURING RECOGNITION OF MICRONESIAtS RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATICON« TC CONTRCL OF LAWS» TO BASIC OWNERSHIO CF LAND, LEFT ONE LARGE AREA OF DISAGREENENT TO BE SETTLED IN PALAU. D> THIS wAS THE ISSUE OF TERMTNATICNs OF HOW -- AND BY WHOM -- ANY FUTURE CCii~ PACT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES 4D MICRONESIA MIGHT BE ENDED, AT KANAy THE UNITED STATES PROPCSED THAT TERMINATION REQUIRE THE CONSENT OF SIDES» WITHOUT THE OTHER SIDE'S Y o. PACE FOUR RURSSAAS595 UNCLAS - INSISTING CN MICRONESIA'S NEED TO CONTROL DESTINYs . ~~ ~ CONSENT == wAS AN ESSENTIAL SAFEGUARD OF MICRONESIAN'S RIGHTS.» "WHILE ITS POLITICAL” ee THE MICROMESIAN DELEGATION ALSO RECOGNIZED THE UNITED STATES NcED TO &E AGLE TO MAKE PLANS ON A LONG-RANGE BASIS AND TO 6E CONFI- ~ DENT OF A STABLE PRESENCE 2 IN THE PACIFIC. "THE ICRONESIAN DELEGATION PRESENTED AN APPROACH DESIGNED TO ACCOMINTERESTS OF BOTH SIDES». WAS ACCEPTED SY ECTH tn MODATE THE my Ge 3£005 890TH. AT HANAy ANO AT KORORs THE MICRONESIAN DELEGATICN MAINTAINED TRAT UNILATERAL TERMINATION == BY EITHER SIDE iF 1DESe IN ITS ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLES AS SLIGHTLY MODIFIED CURING NEGOTIATICNSs THE TERMINATION PROPOSAL HAS FOUR MAIN FEATURESe PONE? FAIR TEST» VO ENSURE IT_ Department of Energy Historian’s Office ARCHIV THAT THE RELATIv OF FREE ASSCCIATION =; Lo | IE GIVchk \A The COMPACT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND WICRONESIA WILL BL TU