-luCOMPOS FTE DCSE ESTIMATES Combining the results trom air teta concentrations (Table 3) and -.uton yields Table S$. (Tatbl.: %) Scpulatlons the follewing isc estimates are presented in estimated from i.ii0 . 1969 2. Tabac S. Census and reg (7), 3 SUMMARY OF DOSE ESTIMATES YEAR OF TEST LoSL UTAH INFANTS NRER 2 YR 4 , ORO ‘jae Los3* 1395 i957 1953 LYoe2 2 62,206 43,009 3.000 UF 500 GE OOR 33, 900 “Ct. George EST. AV. TH. LCSE \IR BETA YIELD 3.9 ° ? 3.9 1.4 1.9 799 68 9.4 L.6 6.3 2.0 8.6 1.4 ? - (RAD) MEAN O.4 3.8 6.3 2.0 8.6 1.4 1.0 6 Agreement between the 1957 dose estimates is a consequence of the way _the data was normalized and signifies nothing. The agreement between the .258 estimates may reflect the fact that the air beta measurements in 1957 and 1958 were made at the same place (Salt Lake City) by the same agency (utah State Department of Health). fortuitous. However, the 1958 agreement may be 4 larger difference is seen in the 1952 estimates when the air samples were taken at Ogden and Price by a different agency and the times (6) after detonation were not given’. Aum eet oie a we t in the 1962 incident individual doses ranged » wete at least LS times the state average ©») and haveprobably occurred in previous years. Despite the Limited accuracy of these estimates, $5 conclusions are suggested: (a) The exposure in 1962 was small compared to that during several pre- ceding years.