wr me DER ree a3 4 Rta oe # y " bie S40 Deed oe 7 Dated Governor Stassen added still another point. He felt that the Soviets were very concerned about the possible proliferation of muclear weapons into other hands. They fear that if this occurs some other nation will trigger a wer which would ultimately involve all-out nuclear conflict between the United States and the USSR. Secretary Dulles expressed his agreement with this point, but added that the nuclear cut-off was the surest defense Seninst that kind of situation. The President expressed the hope that we could advance rapidly in our discovery of detection devices. Dr. Killian indicated that we could not surely detect all nuclear tests. Secretary McElroy pointed out that, as compared to certain other nations, the population of the United States was relatively small. Accordingly, we were compelled to rely on greater fire power. The continued de- velopment of small "clean" nuclear weapons, therefore, was of the very greatest importance to the United States. The President com- mented that certainly we were in the midst of an arms race, and the burdens of armament hung heavy everywhere. of disarmament before the world. We must keep the hope At the conclusion of the discussion of this subject, Mr. Cutler gave his view as to the consensus, and suggested a possible Council action, which was subsequently modified in part by proposals from the President, Secretary Dulles, and Dr. Killian. The National Security Council: a. Noted and discussed the enclosure to the reference memorandum of December 26, 1957, prepared by the Special Assistant to the President for Disarmament; in the light of the views of the Joint Chiefs of Staff thereon, transmitted by the reference memorandum of January 3, 1958. b. Noted the President's decision that the United States should continue to adhere to the Four-Power proposals of August 29, 1957 (Annex D to the reference memorandum of December 26, 1957) for the time being; having in mind the importance > in any further consideration of this subject, of such matters as determining the Congressional attitude to changes in the Atomic En- ergy Act of 1954. Noted the President's approval of the recommendation of the Science Advisory Committee Panel on Disarma- ment (as summarized by Dr. Killian at the meeting) that the following technical studies be made by representatives of the Science Advisory Committee, the Department of Defense, the Atomic Energy Commission, and the Central Intelligence Agency: fero 5 - 13 - fy Goo 8 ‘ desk:deepal’ wt c. | ones aoe t rn. * it

Select target paragraph3